Thanks to Julian Assange we can now see there was an ulterior motive causing US to pass nullification of the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy. Secret reports indicate this move may have been needed so US force could better empathise with locals.

http://washingtonexaminer.com/news/world/2010/12/afghan-sex-practices-concern-us-british-forces

You'd have to get pedaphiles in there too. I posted a thread on this topic some time ago. I have no clue why we work with such a disgusting group of people.

Originally posted by MacSwain
Thanks to Julian Assange we can now see there was an ulterior motive causing US to pass nullification of the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy. Secret reports indicate this move may have been needed so US force could better empathise with locals.

http://washingtonexaminer.com/news/world/2010/12/afghan-sex-practices-concern-us-british-forces

Originally posted by MacSwain
Thanks to Julian Assange we can now see there was an ulterior motive causing US to pass nullification of the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy. Secret reports indicate this move may have been needed so US force could better empathise with locals.

For a male to have sex with a boy is considered a "foible," the report said. By contrast, having sex with an "ineligible woman" would set up "issues of revenge and honor killings."

Years of living under that cultural construct have greatly altered sexual attitudes, the study said. "One of the country's favorite sayings is 'women are for children, boys are for pleasure," the report noted.

Originally posted by Sleepyguy

For a male to have sex with a boy is considered a "foible," the report said. By contrast, having sex with an "ineligible woman" would set up "issues of revenge and honor killings."

Years of living under that cultural construct have greatly altered sexual attitudes, the study said. "One of the country's favorite sayings is 'women are for children, ...[text shortened]... r pleasure," the report noted.

Gack.

I don't see the link to DADT though.

Originally posted by MacSwain
I can see the 'male on male' link......you can't?

I wonder why the article fails to mention the other wikileak that discussed how US taxpayers via private contractors were funding/throwing these child-sex parties.
http://blogs.houstonpress.com/hairballs/2010/12/wikileaks_texas_company_helped.php

Or how this practice had been pretty much eliminated under the rule of the taliban and only returned after we kicked them out......much like the opium growing.