22 Mar '11 20:36>
Originally posted by Bosse de NageIt's never complete, it asymptotes.
Once the revolution is complete, what then?
Originally posted by PalynkaOh, there is room for everything: American Idol, iPads,
Why does it need to be an "inherent behaviour"? Is football? Is playing chess? Which forms of entertainment are "inherent behaviour"? That's a too stringent criteria.
Women like sex. Is this really news? Nope. Do women like porn? I don't see why they shouldn't, especially if made to cater their fantasies too. There are some surveys out there that seem to ...[text shortened]... est that they like different things in porn (as expected) so there room for female porn.
Originally posted by PalynkaYou are. obviously, correct. That doesn't automatically mean that the site in question is equally so. If they produce porn for women, catered to female tastes, fine. But if they, as was quoted, claim to "make love, not porn", then they're being hypocritical. If they made love, not porn, they wouldn't sell it. You can only sell sex, not love. Love is an emotion, and can't be bundled and transported, whereas sex is an act which can be. Sex and love (often) have to do with one another, but they're not the same. Pretending to sell "love, not porn" conflates them, and is dishonest to the customer; pretending to buy ditto, dishonest to oneself.
Women like sex. Is this really news? Nope. Do women like porn? I don't see why they shouldn't, especially if made to cater their fantasies too.
Originally posted by Shallow BlueI agree wholeheartedly.
You are. obviously, correct. That doesn't automatically mean that the site in question is equally so. If they produce porn for women, catered to female tastes, fine. But if they, as was quoted, claim to "make love, not porn", then they're being hypocritical. If they made love, not porn, they wouldn't sell it. You can only sell sex, not love. Love is an labeled "porn". So it's not as if this is a revolutionary idea, either.
Richard