10 Nov '08 20:29>
http://www.apple.com/trailers/independent/thebeautifultruth/
Originally posted by JigtieI sympathize with your opinion. I really do.
If chosen with virulent care I'm certain even a single sentence can kill.
It's all in the affectibility of the recipient. I knew a woman once who was
convinced that by eating only raw vegetables and herbs she could
detoxify her body to such an extent that her own immune system would
kick in and defeat her cancer (much like the Gerson therapy in the
...[text shortened]... t's right. I'm a just a big, cuddly, positive ray of
sunshine, these days.[/i]
Originally posted by PinkFloydI'm sure your death would be much more easy to endure for them. 😕
If I were diagnosed with liver, pancreatic, or bile duct cancer--and surgery would NOT cure me---I would not have chemo or radiation treatment. Not because some movie implied that I have other options, but because I've no desire to put myself and my family through those twin hells. Movie don't kill, any more than words or ideas. Cancer kills. Bullets kill. Not motion pictures.
Originally posted by PalynkaQuite a strong opinion. What's your experience in the field, and upon what data are you basing your opinion?
Why is this not considered a fraud? It's a hoax, being sold for profit.
Originally posted by PalynkaThis is an interesting subject for debate. For example, if people were to act on the incorrect premise and faulty science of this movie:
http://www.apple.com/trailers/independent/thebeautifultruth/
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterDurrrr schwarze Ritter, in Germany's quest to be the worlds leader in renewable energy, millions have lost their lives.
then how many lives would be lost due to economic hardship caused by the reversion back to Civil War-era technology?
Originally posted by RagnorakMost oncologists believe that diet alone can't eradicate cancer, and I
Chemo patients are advised on what they shouldn't and shouldn't eat, so even oncologists accept that diet has an effect on cancer.
Originally posted by PalynkaIt's a good point, but you are assuming facts not in evidence. If EVERY person suffering from cancer went down the same debillitating road, eventually succombing just as doctors predict they would, I'd agree with you. But there are many instances of complete remission that doctors cannot explain. As long as that is the case, I see no hoax/fraud being committed--just alternatives submitted.
Why is this not considered a fraud? It's a hoax, being sold for profit.[/b]