Originally posted by @caesar-saladI don't really care where we finish in this stupid set up
@padger -- If it's any consolation, The Internationals are well ahead of Cawdor in net points so far this year.
It just gives me something to do with my spare time
I do not know why we don't just go in alphabetical order
It would be much better than what we have now
Originally posted by @padgerWhy should you????
Why should I
It's on every result for all to see
You made a statement demanding I show you just one game anywhere in the world where players lose points already won.
I posted several to once again prove you are talking total nonesense
Silence from you on the matter just proves my point.
Originally posted by @roma45The losing in all of theses games is a by product
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
A small selection of games where you lose what you already have won.
Here are just a few that do not have this stupid rule
Snooker.Billiards.Hockey.Ice Hockey.Volley Ball.Football.American Football.Cricket.Baseball.Rugby Union.Rugby League.Bowls.Curling.Dominoes.Cribbage.
Originally posted by @padgerThe argument you put forward has nothing to do with how many games don't adopt a net system
The losing in all of theses games is a by product
Here are just a few that do not have this stupid rule
Snooker.Billiards.Hockey.Ice Hockey.Volley Ball.Football.American Football.Cricket.Baseball.Rugby Union.Rugby League.Bowls.Curling.Dominoes.Cribbage.
You clearly stated no other game in the world does it.
I proved you wrong as usual .
If you don't want to lose by product just don't play a system voted for and supported by almost every one
Originally posted by @roma45I will continue to play these stupid rules and keep complaining about them until someone realises that I am correct
The argument you put forward has nothing to do with how many games don't adopt a net system
You clearly stated no other game in the world does it.
I proved you wrong as usual .
If you don't want to lose by product just don't play a system voted for and supported by almost every one
i think the clan system is a lot better than it was, limiting clans to 3 challenges a time against each other has made a huge difference, also removing games that only had a few moves from the results was a good move, i think the scoring system now works as is shown by the fact that a lot more clans are now in the running for the title after years of it seeming like a two horse race every year
29 Mar 18
Originally posted by @caesar-saladOK well take it to the parks and cafes not on a site like this
The gambling examples remind me that chess in real life is also often played for stakes, in coffee houses and city parks. In those games, there's a net win for one and a net loss for the other.
29 Mar 18
Originally posted by @caesar-saladBest example yet proving the existence of something Padger thinks does not exist apart from RHP,
The gambling examples remind me that chess in real life is also often played for stakes, in coffee houses and city parks. In those games, there's a net win for one and a net loss for the other.