Go back
Nimzovich-Larsen attack - Polish variation

Nimzovich-Larsen attack - Polish variation

1. b3 b5

Nimzovich-Larsen attack - Polish variation

1. b3 b5

Playing the Nimzovich-Larsen attack - Polish variation

The Nimzovich-Larsen Attack, Polish Variation is a chess opening that begins with the moves:


1. b3 e52. Bb2 Nc63. e3 Nf64. c4


This is the Polish Variation, which is named after the country where it was first analyzed and played. The Nimzovich-Larsen Attack itself is named after two chess players, Aron Nimzowitsch and Bent Larsen, who both used it successfully in their games.


Reasons to play the Nimzovich-Larsen Attack, Polish Variation:


1. Unconventional: It's not as common as openings like the Sicilian Defence or the French Defence, so your opponents may not be familiar with it, which can give you an advantage.


2. Flexible: The opening allows for a lot of flexibility. White can choose to play positionally or tactically, depending on how Black responds.


3. Control of Center: White aims to control the center with pawns and pieces, rather than occupying it directly. This can lead to a solid position with good prospects for a slow, strategic game.


4. Avoids Mainline Theory: If you're tired of studying endless variations in more popular openings, the Nimzovich-Larsen Attack can be a refreshing change.


Reasons to avoid the Nimzovich-Larsen Attack, Polish Variation:


1. Slow Development: White's development can be a bit slow, as the bishop is developed before the knights. This can give Black opportunities for a quick attack if not handled carefully.


2. Less Studied: While this can be an advantage, it can also be a disadvantage. There's less analysis and fewer high-level games to study, so you may have to do more independent analysis.


3. Risk of Overextension: White's pawn structure can become overextended if not careful, leading to weaknesses that Black can exploit.


4. Not Suitable for Quick Mate: If you're looking for an opening that leads to quick, tactical mates, this might not be the best choice. It's more suited to slow, strategic games.

Comments (0)

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.