@mott-the-hoople said
who said anything about restricting your speech?

you answer a question that wasnt asked

You post a question that doesn’t fit the answer.

You really are fukked in the head.

@spruce112358 said
Something on the lighter side to argue about...

https://www.yahoo.com/news/billionaire-fights-dock-boat-water-090840830.html

"For the past several years, homeowner Michael Bozutto has been battling [North Palm Beach, FL] for the right to park his 164-foot Westport, dubbed Honey, behind a home he owns at 932 Shore Drive."

"Village officials warned Bozzuto he can' ...[text shortened]... ack against what he believes are fuzzy rules, Bozzuto in March filed a lawsuit against the village."

Occupied by the owner, seems to be the deal breaker here then.

And that doesn’t leave much wiggle room. It clearly states: you can park your boat if the home owner is occupying the house. So, if the home owner is out buying groceries… move the boat.

A few things though: it seems rather impracticle.
And “parking” one’s boat? Really?
Don’t you dock or moor a boat?
Berth?

Damn. Little do I know about boats.

I like the name Fartacus.

Just sayin’.

Hey Joe, Mott and all you other redneck trailer incel trash… do you think the solar eclipse on April 8th is really the moon passing in front of the Sun, or do you think it’s a woke liberal scheme to start the apocalypse?

Just asking. I mean, it’s fair to say all your other opinions are fukking retarded, why wouldn’t this one be as well?

@mott-the-hoople said
sexually perverted mind on display…

it is sad that you think you must communicate in this manner

Freedom of speech, buddy!
First amendement: if you are a kunt, I am free to point it out to you.

Needless to say, in your case, pointing it out is moot. You make it blitheringly clear yourself.

Well, how does it work?
It’s 15 minutes, but well worthwhile:

YouTube?si=8SfmU4ngPT0PmyUE

That is insane. I’d never even heard of these dark pools before.
Obviously, not being a gambling man (unless it’s strip poker with someone else’s wife), I don’t buy stocks or bonds… or whatever the hell you buy there.

It certainly sounds like a den of thieves though.

@rajk999 said
The whole international community ? Well clearly not the ICJ, and the 17 or so experts on genocide. The case South Africa brought against Israel was a failure. They are a stupid country, run by fools, full of idiots like yourself who are illiterate and cannot read for themselves what the Genocide Convention is about.

Educate yourself. Here is part of the ICJ report:
...[text shortened]... eact-what-the-international-court-of-justice-said-and-didnt-say-in-the-genocide-case-against-israel/

Uh… educate yourself, you blithering idiot.
Did the UN pass a resolution?

Fukking retard.

@rajk999 said
Do you really believe your obscenities upset anyone ? You are the laughing stock of this forum. The party in the war that commits war crimes over and over, cannot take the other party to court for suspected war crimes.. thats ludicrous. In the recent case, the ICJ did not rule that Israel was committing war crimes. Any sane level headed person can see that this is war wa ...[text shortened]... m right. Hopefully next time they will learn, although I doubt it. Their head is as hard as yours.

Obnoxious little republikunt, can’t take the hint that nobody is debating him anymore, because everyone except cum stained incels agree with him. The whole fukking international community opposes you a d every fukking retarded claim you make.

Go sniff your mum’s knickers, it’s the closest you’ll ever get to another kunt. You being the obvious first one.

@mott-the-hoople said
Trump outed a liberal democrat activist whose father happens to be a judge over a case against Trump

there…fixed it for you

You fixed nothing, you obnoxious piece of cum stained, right-wingtard comic stuck to the bleeding arse of your mother.

@rajk999 said
You have your head screwed on wrong pal. The party that starts the war, who also commits war crimes [contrary to the Geneva Convention], by firing rockets into civilian areas, by murdering, raping and kidnapping civilians, by placing military hardware in schools, mosques, hospitals etc, by using children as human sheilds ... these people can never get pity from any International Court.

You truly are a moronic kunt.

The answer is obviously: both parties commit crimes, both should be on trial.

However, since you are an obnoxious right-wing fukkwit, that is not the answer I am giving.

Take this son of a syphilitic bitch from the forum, shoot him and feed him to the fukking geese.

Fukk, you are a horrible cum stain on yer mother’s knickers.

@averagejoe1 said
"We are obligated to protect one another's rights equally'.
Those are your words, and then you say we have to pay taxes.

That is two different things. Word salad. And, I have no obligation to protect the rights of someone. You are oriented in mob-speak, everyone is your brother?, everyone is not everyone's brother. Dependents and independents, in the same society ...[text shortened]... ect the rights of each other. When I see dependents coming, I cross to the other side of the street.

Someone, PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF SANITY, drag this sorry arsed republikunt moron out of here, shoot him, butcher him and feed him to the fukking dogs.

I can’t stand his fukking nonsensical existence anymore.

@fartacus said
@kevcvs57

War crimes is a ridiculous concept. It's war, not a sporting event. Also, you can't have some countries dictating what other countries can or cannot do.

Look at NATO and the USA for example...
Chemical weapons are bad! ...but we're just gunna go ahead and drop 2 atom bombs on Japanese women and kids.

Also, tribunals are done by the winners so 🤷

And that, indeed, was a crime against humanity as well.

And the perpetrators should have been dragged off to the Hague, butchered and fed to the fukking dogs.

Nuking civilians. What the fukk is wrong with people!

@kevcvs57 said
Read the same thing in the Gaurdian yesterday the paper trail eventually leads to St Petersburg. Who knew 🤷🏻‍♂️

Whudda thunk it, indeed.

I bet the republkunts on this forum won’t see it that way. BreitfoxgodBS will hve already framed it as BIDEN LIES LAPTOP HUNTER WOKE - and they’ll have swallowed it hook, line and sinker.

@averagejoe1 said
I saw one today, up close enough that I could read it if I had wanted to. I didn't, of course. In a checkout line. Query....Do y'all READ tattoos, do you do it sort of covertly, like maybe when they are distracted? Is it considered an invasion of privacy, or is it welcomed by the tattooee? And why would you read one? Do you put it in the same category as a bumper sticker?

What’s your problem with tattoos?

To be quite frank, you write like someone with a swastika printed on your forehead… I always presumed you were covered in ink.