15 Jan '23 16:15>
@mchill saidDodge my reply if you want to, it’s fine.
You're making this far more complicated than it needs to be. Please go back and read what I wrote.
What I typed is spot on relevant to what you said.
@mchill saidDodge my reply if you want to, it’s fine.
You're making this far more complicated than it needs to be. Please go back and read what I wrote.
@divegeester saidWhat I typed is spot on relevant to what you said.
Dodge my reply if you want to, it’s fine.
What I typed is spot on relevant to what you said.
@mchill saidHere’s the exchange:
What I typed is spot on relevant to what you said.
With all due respect...no its not. Yours is a bunch of loosely connected statements that actually dodges what I wrote.
@divegeester saidWhat did God say to you when you asked Him about this, you petty weed-squabbler and troublemaker?
Here’s the exchange:
@mchill said
Also, we don't need the details of the premise that God speaks and writes his law directly into the hearts of his people, the fact that it exists is sufficient.
@divegeester replied
But the “details” are written in the bible in old and New Testaments. So you’re saying that the “significance” of the premise of my OP about these sc ...[text shortened]... ur claim that “we don’t need the details”.
The “details” are in the bible.
What’s your point?
@kevin-eleven saidHe’s said: “don’t feed the troll”
What did God say to you when you asked Him about this, you petty weed-squabbler and troublemaker?