@divegeester
...and persons with alternative doctrinal interpretations as “heretics”.
At this very hour I am aware that Kellyjay holds a different opinion about the Assurance of eternal salvation then I hold. I could be called "Once Saved Always Saved". He says he is not that.
Have I called him a heretic?
Suzianne I am pretty sure holds a different opinion from me about eternal punishment as a conscious one. Have I called Suzianne a heretic?
There was a poster here (he may be back now for all I know) who strongly disagreed with me teaching one - city / one - church. He said he met with a local assembly in South Africa and didn't like the experience.
Do you recall me telling him he was a heretic?
I am sure Philokalia and I do not always agree.
I have not called him a heretic.
I am sure SecondSon and I do not always agree.
I have not called him a heretic.
Probably dj2becker and I could find
something doctrinal that we have different opinions about. I have not called him a heretic.
Rjhinds I don't think I called a heretic in our strong debates. I did however tell him that there was such a thing as being a Christian with an antichrist attitude in principle. That is strongly denying SOME aspect of the total nature of Christ can be, in principle, an antichrist attitude robbing Christ of SOME aspect of His total nature.
Ie. He is God but not a man.
He is a man yet not God.
He is not the Creator.
He is not a creature as a man.
I did warn him that these could be antichrist like attitudes.
But I think you are exaggerating if you mean I have that tendency.