12 Sep '19 04:57>
@fmf saidLol. Back to your favorite ripcord again.
Already explained ad nauseam, in the past, over and over again, every time this topic came up, and now again on this thread, Go back and read my posts.
@fmf saidLol. Back to your favorite ripcord again.
Already explained ad nauseam, in the past, over and over again, every time this topic came up, and now again on this thread, Go back and read my posts.
@fmf saidYou can’t know that. But you are entitled to your opinion.
Your "truth" claims about "everlasting life" are not "objective".
@dj2becker saidIt's your prerogative to believe and claim that you are debating this topic in good faith.
Lol. Back to your favorite ripcord again.
@dj2becker saidWe are both entitled to our subjective opinions about whether there is or isn't "everlasting life". My belief - that there isn't - is subjective. Your belief - that there is - is subjective.
You can’t know that. But you are entitled to your opinion.
@fmf saidLogically only one of them will turn out to be objectively true.
We are both entitled to our subjective opinions about whether there is or isn't "everlasting life". My belief - that there isn't - is subjective. Your belief - that there is - is subjective.
@dj2becker saidI believe neither of us will be able to make any "objectively true" claims once we're dead. Any claim that you make now regarding how you will be able to make "objectively true" claims after you're dead - as a result of you having "everlasting life" - are completely subjective.
Logically only one of them will turn out to be objectively true.
@fmf saidYou don’t have to make a claim for it to be true. If it is true it’s true regardless of the claims you happen to make and whether you think it’s subjective or not.
I believe neither of us will be able to make any "objectively true" claims once we're dead. Any claim that you make now regarding how you will be able to make "objectively true" claims after you're dead - as a result of you having "everlasting life" - are completely subjective.
@dj2becker saidAnd if it turns out to be true it would have been objectively true all along.
Logically only one of them will turn out to be objectively true.
@dj2becker saidI've and others have comprehensively demonstrated to you the rational and reasoning as to why personal spiritual experience is subjective and therefore opinion. I suggest you go back and read those posts and comment directly about what was said instead of downshifting into your @fetchmyjunk modus opperandi of ignoring replies and asking the same question over and over and over and over again.
Oh I see. It’s ok to call your opinions facts. Would you say spiritual matters are still opinion based and subjective even if they happen to be true?
@dj2becker saidNonsense.
And if it turns out to be true it would have been objectively true all along.
@dj2becker saidThe key word in your post is "possible".
So now you suddenly agree that it is possible for a subjective opinion to be true?
@dj2becker saidThe key word in your post is "if".
If those subjective opinions turned out to be true what makes you so sure that it’s impossible for opinions about supernatural causality and divine law to be true?
@dj2becker saidThe key word in your post is "possible".
So now you suddenly agree that it is possible for a subjective opinion to be true?
@dj2becker saidNo it isn't.
Truth by definition is objective.
@dj2becker saidThe key words in your post are "turn out".
Logically only one of them will turn out to be objectively true.