10 Feb '19 02:16>
@fmf saidAnd yet what is being pushed here isn't being pushed as random actions by undirected process. What is being discussed are things that occur with regularity why, design. No one is suggesting that life cannot spring up, only that it is a result of a directed process not one without direction and without all things being in place to make them occur.
[youtube]A_dDsiFZa1U[/youtube]
@kellyjay saidTry watching a video clip that debunks your Argument from Improbability. And then decide which one you agree with.
And yet what is being pushed here isn't being pushed as random actions by undirected process. What is being discussed are things that occur with regularity why, design. No one is suggesting that life cannot spring up, only that it is a result of a directed process not one without direction and without all things being in place to make them occur.
You could do the math on ...[text shortened]... specific order that matches what is required, well all bets are off and the odds become quite large.
@fmf saidSounds like one to me. 🙂
Your video, interestingly enough, invites and allows no discussion underneath it. Mine, by contrast, has hundreds and hundreds of people discussing it in the comments under the video. What were the chances of that being the case?
@fmf saidIt doesn't debunk it, improbability with undirected process goes completely by chance, directed processes doesn't. Which proves my point! Thank you for the helpful link!
Try watching a video clip that debunks your Argument from Improbability. And then decide which one you agree with.
@kellyjay saidWhat "directed processes"?
It doesn't debunk it, improbability with undirected process goes completely by chance, directed processes doesn't.
@kellyjay saidYou should just decide which one you agree with.
Thank you for the helpful link!
@fmf saidWell let’s start with the first example your link brought up, you think those were odds against human birth to be overcome? The process of childbirth is a well-established process, we were designed that way nothing more, or less. Compatible parts join, they act accordingly, and a life is started in a place designed for its gestation until birth.
What "directed processes"?
@fmf saidNo, I'm going with the one that makes most sense, and that isn't random chance over time, springing forth from universe that started all by itself out of nothing, for no reason.
You should just decide which one you agree with.
@kellyjay saidYou should base your decision as to whichever one you agree with on whatever criteria you want.
No, I'm going with the one that makes most sense, and that isn't random chance over time, springing forth from universe that started all by itself out of nothing, for no reason.
@kellyjay saidWhat "directed processes" are you talking about?
Well let’s start with the first example your link brought up, you think those were odds against human birth to be overcome? The process of childbirth is a well-established process, we were designed that way nothing more, or less. Compatible parts join, they act accordingly, and a life is started in a place designed for its gestation until birth.
Now if you want to talk ab ...[text shortened]... tion from one life form into the next game over, start your calculations there and tell me the odds.
@fmf saidNo, which ever one I want isn't a criteria with which to base anything on. People who select religions on what they like are not seeking truth they want their ears itched.
You should base your decision as to whichever one you agree with on whatever criteria you want.