Noah's Ark Discovered

I just watched this scientific video, again, link below; where they claim to have discovered Noah's Ark. Everything fits according to God's Holy Word the Bible; and, the Muslim Koran. Thoughts anyone after watching this shortened video?
YouTube

@kingdavid403 said
I just watched this scientific video, again, link below; where they claim to have discovered Noah's Ark. Everything fits according to God's Holy Word the Bible; and, the Muslim Koran. Thoughts anyone after watching this shortened video?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQwfU7DvUyE

I saw this research several years ago and found some of it intriguing. However there is lots of incongruence with the claims and established science such as the length of time wood takes to fossilise for example.

@divegeester said
I saw this research several years ago and found some of it intriguing. However there is lots of incongruence with the claims and established science such as the length of time wood takes to fossilise for example.

However there is lots of incongruence with the claims and established science such as the length of time wood takes to fossilise for example.
Do you think the wood from Noah's Ark would be fossilized by the time this discovery was made? I guess I find this particular argument of the wood mute.
Do you have another one or two arguments or opinions on this discovery, or on what these scientists said or claimed? I'm interested.
I'm gonna look into the wood thing further.

@kingdavid403 said
Do you think the wood from Noah's Ark would be fossilized by the time this discovery was made? I guess I find this particular argument of the wood mute.
Do you have another one or two arguments or opinions on this discovery, or on what these scientists said or claimed? I'm interested.

From what I understand of the petrifying process, it takes a huge amount of time and certainly lot longer than the biblical timeline would provide.

Let’s stick with the fossilisation piece before moving on. Did you want to add something other then saying it is “mute” (sic)

@kingdavid403 said

I'm gonna look into the wood thing further.

Ok.

I’ve just seen your edit here, which was made after my subsequent reply.

@divegeester said
From what I understand of the petrifying process, it takes a huge amount of time and certainly lot longer than the biblical timeline would provide.

Let’s stick with the fossilisation piece before moving on. Did you want to add something other then saying it is “mute” (sic)

From what I understand of the petrifying process, it takes a huge amount of time and certainly lot longer than the biblical timeline would provide.
Yes, I agree. However, I have never agreed with mans current Biblical timeline. They currently say Noah's flood was around six thousand years ago. I highly disagree. However, I cannot prove it either.
Let’s stick with the fossilization piece before moving on. Did you want to add something other then saying it is “mute” (sic)
I did not say it was mute. I said I think it is mute. Meaning to I; I'm nobody special.

@kingdavid403 said
I did not say it was mute. I said I think it is mute. Meaning to I; I'm nobody special.

Ok, so my point about the science of fossilisation might not actually BE moot (spelling), but you “THINK” it may be moot and you would rather talk about that rather than the topic?

@divegeester said
Ok, so my point about the science of fossilisation might not actually BE moot (spelling), but you “THINK” it may be moot and you would rather talk about that rather than the topic?

fossilisation is fossilization. Spelling. 🙂
Yes, you are correct, Your point seemed moot to me, not mute.
And no, I'd rather talk about the topic. 🙂 However, it's clear that the wood would be old either way. Then you have flood, buried in volcanic lava, etc etc.
I think Noah's flood happened much longer ago than six thousand years. Thoughts?

@kingdavid403 said
fossilisation is fossilization. Spelling.

Huh?

@fmf said
Huh?

LOL, well that's what my spell check says. Yes, I can't spell well. lol 🙂 I see the difference now after looking it up. lol Now, do you have any thoughts or contributions on this subject?

@kingdavid403 said
LOL, well that's what my spell check says. Yes, I can't spell well. lol 🙂 I see the difference now after looking it up. lol

Did you already completely believe the Noah's ark story even before you came across whatever is in your YouTube clip? Or were you a sceptic before, or even someone who didn't believe the story?

@fmf said
Did you already completely believe the Noah's ark story even before you came across whatever is in your YouTube clip? Or were you a sceptic before, or even someone who didn't believe the story?

I believe 100% what the Bible says of Noah, or anyone or anything else that it tells us. And, I believe there is so much more that we do not know. You?

@kingdavid403 said
I believe 100% what the Bible says of Noah, or anyone or anything else that it tells us. And, I believe there is so much more that we do not know. You?

No, I am not a Muslim, a Jew or a Christian, so to me the Noah story is mythology.

@fmf said
No, I am not a Muslim, a Jew or a Christian, so to me the Noah story is mythology.

Most non-believers feel the same as you; nothing new to I. So, did you watch the video? Any comments on the video?

@kingdavid403 said
Most non-believers feel the same as you; nothing new to I. So, did you watch the video? Any comments on the video?

No. All I was interested in was your answer to the question "Did you already completely believe the Noah's ark story even before you came across whatever is in your YouTube clip?" And your answer was - I think - yes. So, thanks.