14 Sep '20 05:38>
@divegeester saidThis is interestingly vague, in a "I don't want to be outed for lying" kind of way.
I’m not the person who is continually criticising other posters whilst doing the very same thing. Suzianne is.
@divegeester saidThis is interestingly vague, in a "I don't want to be outed for lying" kind of way.
I’m not the person who is continually criticising other posters whilst doing the very same thing. Suzianne is.
@suzianne saidIt’s just me talking about you being a forum hypocrite whereby you viciously criticise certain posters whom you disapprove of for what you see as them “attacking” others posters whom you do approved of .... whilst you yourself “attack” those posters whom you disapprove of.
This is interestingly vague, in a "I don't want to be outed for lying" kind of way.
@divegeester said“Heroine” not heroin.
It’s just me talking about you being a forum hypocrite whereby you viciously criticise certain posters whom you disapprove of for what you see as them “attacking” others posters whom you do approved of .... whilst you yourself “attack” those posters whom you disapprove of.
It’s a commentary which is as old as these forum hills which includes your make-believe heroin ...[text shortened]... when scrutinising their credibility.
Let me now if you need further explanation about my “lies”.
@divegeester saidThanks for bringing us up to 'speed.'
“Heroine” not heroin.
Easily done.
The typo, not the drug.
Although possibly that too.
I’ll stop now...
@ghost-of-a-duke saidSome are indeed ‘slower’ than others, so I’m pleased to be able to help.
Thanks for bringing us up to 'speed.'
@divegeester saidNo, I need no further explantion of your lies. They're perfectly clear to me.
It’s just me talking about you being a forum hypocrite whereby you viciously criticise certain posters whom you disapprove of for what you see as them “attacking” others posters whom you do approved of .... whilst you yourself “attack” those posters whom you disapprove of.
It’s a commentary which is as old as these forum hills which includes your make-believe heroin ...[text shortened]... when scrutinising their credibility.
Let me now if you need further explanation about my “lies”.
@suzianne saidWhy have you put the word “offended” in quotes?
Sure you won't publicly post it later, if you're "offended" by it?
@suzianne saidHow can I be “lying” about your harassing and browbeating other posters when here you are, in the very thread, admitting to it?
Unfortunately, I was responsible for a lot of it.
Okay, most of it.
@suzianne saidWhat “lies”?
No, I need no further explantion of your lies. They're perfectly clear to me.