08 Dec '18 02:24>
@suzianne saidI think it's a good idea that the government does not establish a state religion or that a religion is designated and endorsed by the state. And the First Amendment provides for exactly that when it makes it clear that the state has no business making laws with respect to the establishment of religion.
Religion and government should not mix.
Have you ever heard of the First Amendment?
The church should have zero say in government.
Don't like it? Change the Constitution. Good luck with that.
Is anyone trying to establish a 'state religion'? If they are, they have the First Amendment to contend with.
But the same First Amendment forbids state action that prohibits the free exercise of religion or that abridges the freedom of speech and the press, that restricts the right to peaceably assemble, or the right to petition the government for redress of grievances.
The churches are comparable to trade unions: they are organizations that represent the beliefs and interests of their members and amplify their voices - including their grievances and petitions and their opinions about policies based on their perspectives.
As long as the state is not trying to establish a government-backed national religion, I think the First Amendment protects the right for religious people and religious institutions to lobby and pressure and demand government policies consistent with their worldviews and beliefs.