13 Mar '20 05:57>
Someone on Thread 184299 [page 3] on the Debates Forum [Duchess64] is insinuating - rather unbelievably - that she was sexually or personally harassed, persistently so, via PMs on this site [by a poster called sonhouse] where no one is able to verify this by looking at these alleged messages for themselves.
And another long-gone poster's PMs or posts [Flower04, last moved almost 4 years ago] are being cited as some sort of corroboration too, and these alleged messages cannot be verified either.
It is some sort of public poison-the-well smack-down gimmick [that has been trotted out over and over again] and I don't think RHP be should tolerate it.
If the perpetrator of this smearing did not make a complaint at the time [or the complaint was found to be unfounded] she should not be allowed to do this.
You crack down on people calling each other cheats. So why not stop people insinuating that others are creepy stalkers or harassers based on their own memory of secret "evidence"?
And another long-gone poster's PMs or posts [Flower04, last moved almost 4 years ago] are being cited as some sort of corroboration too, and these alleged messages cannot be verified either.
It is some sort of public poison-the-well smack-down gimmick [that has been trotted out over and over again] and I don't think RHP be should tolerate it.
If the perpetrator of this smearing did not make a complaint at the time [or the complaint was found to be unfounded] she should not be allowed to do this.
You crack down on people calling each other cheats. So why not stop people insinuating that others are creepy stalkers or harassers based on their own memory of secret "evidence"?