@shallow-bluesaid Lies, damned lies, and Metal Brain. Come on, stop pretending that Pikiwedia is on your side - even Facebook is not as pathetic as you are.
Development of COVID-19 vaccines utilizing gene therapy technology
@Metal-Brain "Is PubMed trustworthy?
The growth of PubMed Central (PMC) and public access mandates have affected PubMed's composition. The authors tested recent claims that content in PMC is of low quality and affects PubMed's reliability, while exploring PubMed's role in the current scholarly communications landscape."
Flu has allegedly disappeared (it hasn't, it's largely been rebranded as Covid 19 as the PCR test can't distinguishe between the two as i will show).
Is there something going around - absolutely yes, but we haven't proven that it's what we are boing told it is (could be just incompetence or greed, who knows?). The whole exercise has been a fudge; I'm surprosed that intelligent people haven't picked up on it. Deaths are based on dying "with" covid, not of - you might as well say that people are dying with pubic hair. Anyway ..........
Here's the notes for Health Care Professionals on this super duper all singing test that it's inventor told us wasn't suitable for epidemic testing in the first place. Nobody has yet come up with a test to prove the presence of Covid Sars 2 infection.
"RT-PCR detects presence of viral genetic material in a sample but is not able to
distinguish whether infectious virus is present. The quantity of intact virus in upper
respiratory swabs will be affected by factors that are endogenous and exogenous to
laboratory methods." Page 6 paragraph 1 directly after the first diagram.
According to Dr Mike Yeadon (and this big hitter is certainly not alone) the former head of respiratory medicine at Pfizer (no less, those good people that make one of the jabs) the error rate on the PCR test is 90%. You have more chance of getting this right by flipping a coin.