05 Jan '21 22:27>1 edit
@metal-brain saidwe won't baby sit you. If you really want to know, which we all know you don't because you are just trolling, Look it up in the many studies yourself.
Which countries?
@metal-brain saidwe won't baby sit you. If you really want to know, which we all know you don't because you are just trolling, Look it up in the many studies yourself.
Which countries?
@humy saidNot the Netherlands apparently.
we won't baby sit you. If you really want to know, which we all know you don't because you are just trolling, Look it up in the many studies yourself.
@metal-brain saidI just looked into this and discovered you have scored your own goal yet again and here's why;
Not the Netherlands apparently.
@humy said"The fact that Netherlands has been BOTH one of the countries worst effected by covid"
I just looked into this and discovered you have scored your own goal yet again and here's why;
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-55143938
"...The Netherlands has made it compulsory to wear a face mask in indoor public spaces in an effort to contain the spread of coronavirus.
The country is one of the last in Europe to introduce such a measure.
...
The Nethe ...[text shortened]... virus before the compulsory face masks; Netherlands, if anything, shows masks help slow the spread.
@metal-brain saidSo now, after you said Netherlands is one of the worst hit by covid but than after I showed how Netherlands being hit more by covid than most other countries is actually evidence FOR masks slowing the spread because they made them mandatory LATER than most other countries thus giving the virus spread more of a head start, you backtrack by playing DOWN their death rate . Sorry! You fool nobody here! I have debunked your whole argument.
"The fact that Netherlands has been BOTH one of the countries worst effected by covid"
That is not a fact. They are 15th in C19 deaths in Europe.
@humy said"So now, after you said Netherlands is one of the worst hit by covid"
So now, after you said Netherlands is one of the worst hit by covid but than after I showed how Netherlands being hit more by covid than most other countries is actually evidence FOR masks slowing the spread because they made them mandatory LATER than most other countries thus giving the virus spread more of a head start, you backtrack by playing DOWN their death rate . Sorry! Y ...[text shortened]... y here! I have debunked your whole argument.
The rest of your post is irrelevant because of this.
@metal-brain saidNo lying intended and I should have been more precise in my wording and said I assume you "implied" it else I fail to see what's argument, but you often fail to make your exact and complete argument completely clear and explicit thus force us to make a guess of what exactly it is and thus you cannot blame us but rather only yourself when we guess wrong.
"So now, after you said Netherlands is one of the worst hit by covid"
Stop lying!
@humy saidI told you the Netherlands was 15th several times. You know fully well they are nowhere close to #1.
No lying intended and I should have been more precise in my wording and said I assume you "implied" it else I fail to see what's argument, but you often fail to make your exact and complete argument completely clear and explicit thus force us to make a guess of what exactly it is and thus you cannot blame us but rather only yourself when we guess wrong.
So why did you keep ment ...[text shortened]... n it is a statistical fact that Netherlands IS one of the worst hit by covid, which proves my point.
@metal-brain saidNo, because, as you well know I and others here pointed out but you are pretending to be too stupid to get it, face masks are not the ONLY factor effecting the rate of spread of the virus thus we wouldn't always expect a simple linear relationship between masks and spread across all countries without exceptions. There are likely to be a few exceptions. You fool nobody here.
If mandating masks was effective they would be in the top 5 and they are not even in the top 10.
@humy saidThen it is impossible to prove masks are effective except with randomized controlled trials just as I have been saying all along.
No, because, as you well know I and others here pointed out but you are pretending to be too stupid to get it, face masks are not the ONLY factor effecting the rate of spread of the virus thus we wouldn't always expect a simple linear relationship between masks and spread across all countries without exceptions. There are likely to be a few exceptions. You fool nobody here.
@metal-brain saidfalse.
Then it is impossible to prove masks are effective except with randomized controlled trials
@humy saidYou are a moron
false.
Using your exact same moronic logic; it is impossible to prove water is effective at distinguishing fire except with randomized controlled trials because water is not the ONLY thing that distinguishes fire.
@jinxdawson saidI am sure that there is much corruption in China and I would guess probably even more so than the huge corruption that exists in many other countries including in the US when Trump was president and that's saying a lot, but, "They laugh at the high numbers of deaths in the USA and Europe"? That's just unintelligent worthless BS anti-China propaganda. If you imply that masks made in China are on average not nearly as good as masks made elsewhere, show us a weblink explaining the evidence for that...
Problems with masks: China makes most of them. China makes crappy stuff. China makes them and sells them to the world and yet the China Virus originated in China. China profitters from the suffering of others. As it always has. They laugh at the high numbers of deaths in the USA and Europe. Funny stuff for them.