@metal-brain said
Show me the missing last 6 years of data from the NASA graph and I will show you the math just as I pledged to do before.
How, just as you claimed, did you do the maths to work out what proportion of warming is man made from that graph if, just as you imply above, you do not have sufficient data from the graph to do the maths? You contradict yourself.
So, that's go through this yet again just one step at a time shall we?
1, Are you claiming that you cannot do the maths without that "missing data" (your exact words) ?
A simple "yes" or "no" answer is all that is required and anything else proves you are talking crap.
2, If the answer to 1 above is "yes", then how is it possible, just as you claimed earlier, you did the "simple maths" (your exact words) when you now claim you cannot do the maths without that "missing data"?
Failure to answer 2 proves you LIED; you didn't do the maths (and cannot).
3, If the answer to 1 above is "no" and you didn't lie about doing the maths, then why cannot you prove yourself NOT to be a liar just by show me (and all of us) the maths you did?
Failure to answer 3 and failure to show your maths proves, again, you LIED; you didn't do the maths (and cannot).
4, Lets say you where given the "missing data". What maths FORMULA (as apposed to the maths CALCULATION) would you then use?
Since you don't have to have the "missing data" to show as the maths FORMULA you would use if you hypothetically had the data, failure to answer 4 proves you LIED; you cannot do the maths even if you had that "missing data" because there is no maths FORMULA for that.
Your expected failure to answer any of the above questions just confirms what I and we all already know; you are a perpetual LIAR.