11 Oct '19 01:48>7 edits
@DeepThought
Yes, I mean the conspirators are most likely US citizens, possibly CIA or some other secret agency. Al Qaeda was not a conspirator, it was a puppet. Would you not suspect Top Secret agencies like the CIA understand how to best keep conspiracies intact. They were willing to kill thousands of people, of course they new they had to minimize risk by double crossing co conspirators. And what better way can you think of than to annihilate them in the actual attack?
I want to be clear about this. Two Structural Steel Frame High Rises collapsed that were designed to handle jet aircraft impacts and remain standing. If that alone wasn't the greatest engineering failure known to man, then it was followed by the collapse of 3 other steel frame high rises collapsed into complete rubble without any impacts at all! One WTC 7 sited by NIST as having collapsed from due to normal office fires. Something that has never happened in the entire history of modern steel frame high rises, and hasn't happened since! We are talking about 5 engineering nightmares of unsurmountable proportions!
https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/faqs/360-faq-2-were-the-twin-towers-designed-to-withstand-the-impact-of-the-airplanes
WTC 7 collapse video is extensive and easily accessible. NIST had to reverse an official position about "free fall" acceleration achieved posed by a high school physics teacher with a BS in Physics and an MS in Mathematics! You with a PhD in Physics probably have access to the same software or better. Measure it yourself.
https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/free-fall-acceleration
In this video you can listen to NIST lead investigators of the structural failures literally bumbling around trying to explain "g". Its utterly flabbergasting!
https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/videos/video/7-nist-finally-admits-free-fall-part-1
At a little before 3:22 s to a little after in the video listen carefully. Saunders ( NIST lead Structural Engineer) clearly says the VIDEO analysis shows 3.9 s for the top of the building to fall the full 17 visible floors. Then he says for the model to fall over the same distance it would take 5.4 seconds because of structural resistance etc... He got it completely backwards!
Yes, I mean the conspirators are most likely US citizens, possibly CIA or some other secret agency. Al Qaeda was not a conspirator, it was a puppet. Would you not suspect Top Secret agencies like the CIA understand how to best keep conspiracies intact. They were willing to kill thousands of people, of course they new they had to minimize risk by double crossing co conspirators. And what better way can you think of than to annihilate them in the actual attack?
I want to be clear about this. Two Structural Steel Frame High Rises collapsed that were designed to handle jet aircraft impacts and remain standing. If that alone wasn't the greatest engineering failure known to man, then it was followed by the collapse of 3 other steel frame high rises collapsed into complete rubble without any impacts at all! One WTC 7 sited by NIST as having collapsed from due to normal office fires. Something that has never happened in the entire history of modern steel frame high rises, and hasn't happened since! We are talking about 5 engineering nightmares of unsurmountable proportions!
https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/faqs/360-faq-2-were-the-twin-towers-designed-to-withstand-the-impact-of-the-airplanes
WTC 7 collapse video is extensive and easily accessible. NIST had to reverse an official position about "free fall" acceleration achieved posed by a high school physics teacher with a BS in Physics and an MS in Mathematics! You with a PhD in Physics probably have access to the same software or better. Measure it yourself.
https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/free-fall-acceleration
In this video you can listen to NIST lead investigators of the structural failures literally bumbling around trying to explain "g". Its utterly flabbergasting!
https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/videos/video/7-nist-finally-admits-free-fall-part-1
At a little before 3:22 s to a little after in the video listen carefully. Saunders ( NIST lead Structural Engineer) clearly says the VIDEO analysis shows 3.9 s for the top of the building to fall the full 17 visible floors. Then he says for the model to fall over the same distance it would take 5.4 seconds because of structural resistance etc... He got it completely backwards!