1. SubscriberPonderable
    chemist
    Linkenheim
    Joined
    22 Apr '05
    Moves
    655192
    25 Nov '19 09:45
    https://www.sciencealert.com/physicists-claim-a-they-ve-found-even-more-evidence-of-a-new-force-of-nature

    I am a bit astonished this has not been brougt here.

    It seems thatHungarian Professor Krasznahorkay and his Group have performed Experiments that lead to the conclusion that there is a new bososn with mass 17 eV and a hitherto unknown force carried by that new particle.
    As of now the article is in peer-review, but preliminary results have been published already.

    I for one am excited a bit.
  2. Standard memberDeepThought
    Losing the Thread
    Quarantined World
    Joined
    27 Oct '04
    Moves
    87415
    25 Nov '19 10:05
    @ponderable said
    https://www.sciencealert.com/physicists-claim-a-they-ve-found-even-more-evidence-of-a-new-force-of-nature

    I am a bit astonished this has not been brougt here.

    It seems thatHungarian Professor Krasznahorkay and his Group have performed Experiments that lead to the conclusion that there is a new bososn with mass 17 eV and a hitherto unknown force carried by that new pa ...[text shortened]... in peer-review, but preliminary results have been published already.

    I for one am excited a bit.
    Forgive my skepticism, but if there's a fundamental boson with a mass of 17 MeV, and it couples strongly enough to influence the cross-section of beryllium 8 decay, why hasn't it been noticed in accelerator surveys. The mass is small enough that one would expect to be able to detect it with pretty basic equipment.

    I'll have a read of the pre-print at some point in the next week and make a less knee-jerky comment then. Their paper is available at:

    https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.10459
  3. SubscriberPonderable
    chemist
    Linkenheim
    Joined
    22 Apr '05
    Moves
    655192
    25 Nov '19 11:35
    @deepthought said
    Forgive my skepticism, but if there's a fundamental boson with a mass of 17 MeV, and it couples strongly enough to influence the cross-section of beryllium 8 decay, why hasn't it been noticed in accelerator surveys. The mass is small enough that one would expect to be able to detect it with pretty basic equipment.

    I'll have a read of the pre-print at some point in the ...[text shortened]... ke a less knee-jerky comment then. Their paper is available at:

    https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.10459
    Thank you for the link (didn't find that one)
  4. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    11 Dec '19 16:05
    @Ponderable
    The word on the street is they made some kind of error. The argument goes, the actual MEV readout is low enough for even college accelerators to have seen and it has not been seen by anyone but them.
    Which doesn't mean they are mistaken, the readings may have just been missed by everyone. News at 11......
  5. SubscriberSuzianne
    Misfit Queen
    Isle of Misfit Toys
    Joined
    08 Aug '03
    Moves
    36633
    03 Jan '20 18:58
    @sonhouse said
    @Ponderable
    The word on the street is they made some kind of error. The argument goes, the actual MEV readout is low enough for even college accelerators to have seen and it has not been seen by anyone but them.
    Which doesn't mean they are mistaken, the readings may have just been missed by everyone. News at 11......
    Hmmmmm, shades of "cold fusion"?
  6. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    03 Jan '20 19:13
    @Suzianne
    News at 11....
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree