"magic" angle for Graphene discoveries

@Metal-Brain
The thing is, you put out so many BS conspiracy theory ultrarightwingnutjub sites when you put out one about actual science we have to wonder when the weaponization shoe will drop, proving how stupid Dr. Fauci is or some such.

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
The thing is, you put out so many BS conspiracy theory ultrarightwingnutjub sites when you put out one about actual science we have to wonder when the weaponization shoe will drop, proving how stupid Dr. Fauci is or some such.

Researchers at Georgia State University and Emory University have developed an intranasal influenza vaccine using recombinant hemagglutinin (HA), a protein found on the surface of influenza viruses, as the antigen component of the vaccine.

They also created a two-dimensional nanomaterial (polyethyleneimine-functionalized graphene oxide nanoparticles) and found that it displayed potent adjuvant (immunoenhancing) effects on influenza vaccines delivered intranasally.

https://www.graphene-info.com/graphene-oxide-gives-boost-new-intranasal-flu-vaccine

Are you claiming graphene is not poisonous or that it is not in any vaccines?

@Metal-Brain
You are asking ME, a dude who maxed out working on Apollo, I am a hardware specialist not a virologist so why would you even ASK me that question?

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
You are asking ME, a dude who maxed out working on Apollo, I am a hardware specialist not a virologist so why would you even ASK me that question?

You are not a climate scientist either, but you think your opinion on that is worthy.

Are you claiming graphene is not poisonous or that it is not in any vaccines?

@Metal-Brain
No but I bet YOU are. Just a hunch.
Here is something to think about.

Instead of running your mouth against an agenda that only seeks to weaponize science for political purposes, try this:

LOOK AT OTHER SCIENCES FOR SCIENCE HAVING NOTHING TO DO WITH STUPID POLITICS.

Try it sometime, you might even like it.

Did you perhaps notice a pattern in MY science posts?

Do you see even a HINT of partisan politics?

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
No but I bet YOU are. Just a hunch.
Here is something to think about.

Instead of running your mouth against an agenda that only seeks to weaponize science for political purposes, try this:

LOOK AT OTHER SCIENCES FOR SCIENCE HAVING NOTHING TO DO WITH STUPID POLITICS.

Try it sometime, you might even like it.

Did you perhaps notice a pattern in MY science posts?

Do you see even a HINT of partisan politics?

Are you claiming graphene is not poisonous or that it is not in any vaccines?

https://www.graphene-info.com/graphene-oxide-gives-boost-new-intranasal-flu-vaccine

So they are still putting known poisons in vaccines, right? Isn't graphene in the body like tiny little razor blades being put in your body? Think about that.

@Metal-Brain
Like I said, you have ZERO interest in actual science, you know, fundamental discoveries that can make lives better but ALL you want and I mean exactly that, ALL you want is to weaponize science for your own sick agenda's.
Forget me answering your cynical questions.

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
Like I said, you have ZERO interest in actual science, you know, fundamental discoveries that can make lives better but ALL you want and I mean exactly that, ALL you want is to weaponize science for your own sick agenda's.
Forget me answering your cynical questions.

Are you claiming graphene is not poisonous or that it is not in any vaccines?

https://www.graphene-info.com/graphene-oxide-gives-boost-new-intranasal-flu-vaccine

So they are still putting known poisons in vaccines, right? Isn't graphene in the body like tiny little razor blades being put in your body?

Failure to answer is an admission of failure.

Invasive brain interfaces.

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/human-augmentation-the-dawn-of-a

@Metal-Brain
You really know how to jump on inconsequential issues. What will be the next one? Bitching about where the ISS is going to land?

@metal-brain said
Are you claiming graphene is not poisonous or that it is not in any vaccines?

Failure to answer is an admission of failure.

Repeating your dishonest questions verbatim does not make them honest.

The only failure here is your failure at asking honest, non-leading questions.

@shallow-blue said
Repeating your dishonest questions verbatim does not make them honest.

The only failure here is your failure at asking honest, non-leading questions.

There is nothing dishonest about my question?

Is graphene poisonous?
Is graphene in vaccines?

What is dishonest about those questions? Nothing. That makes you dishonest. You are being dishonest about why you are evading those questions.

You are evading the questions because you know the answer to both is yes and you don't want to defend it. You would embarrass yourself.

Did you download the PDF from the UK government posted on Malone's substack article?

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
You really know how to jump on inconsequential issues. What will be the next one? Bitching about where the ISS is going to land?

Did you download the PDF from the UK government posted on Malone's substack article?

Brain interface is a military advantage. That makes it a competition. Now all nations must utilize that technology. That is how it works. Nation that don't will be wiped off the world map.

@metal-brain said
There is nothing dishonest about my question?

Is graphene poisonous?
Is graphene in vaccines?

There is everything dishonest about your questions. All your questions.

You ask a question about "graphene", without acknowledging that there is no such thing as "graphene", simple. There are graphenes, many of them, with different properties.

You ask whether "it" (which doesn't exist as a single substance) is poisonous, without acknowledging that a substance may be poisonous in some environments, and innocent in others; poisonous in some concentrations, and innocent in lesser or greater ones; one substance may be poisonous under some circumstances, and a closely related one may not only be innocent but even beneficial in the same, or in other, circumstances.

Reveal Hidden Content

You ask whether "it" (whichever individual kind of it you presume to be the all-encompassing "graphene"😉 is in "vaccines". In which vaccine? In how many vaccines? Of course, if one graphene is used in the manufacture, but not present in the final product, of one single vaccine, you will interpret that as "graphene is in vaccines", and then pretend that "all vaccines are poisonous, all-graphene riddled poisons". Never mind whether any of this is of any relevance to whichever Covid vaccine you are panicking about, any hint of any single kind of graphene being involved, however distantly, in the production of any kind of vaccine, will convince you that "vaccines are graphene" and therefore poisonous.

No, not a single question you ask is honest.

And now you will reply by repeating those two questions. Because, of course you will.

@Shallow-Blue
This dude has major OCD issues. He is one obsessive SOB.