1. Subscribermoonbus
    Über-Nerd
    Joined
    31 May '12
    Moves
    8144
    30 May '22 07:51
    It’s only 30 years away now (again):


    https://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2022/05/world/iter-nuclear-fusion-climate-intl-cnnphotos/
  2. SubscriberPonderableonline
    chemist
    Linkenheim
    Joined
    22 Apr '05
    Moves
    653703
    30 May '22 08:00
    @moonbus said
    It’s only 30 years away now (again):


    https://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2022/05/world/iter-nuclear-fusion-climate-intl-cnnphotos/
    I attended a lecture while studying chemistry (early 90's). It was called "The history of nuclear technology"

    Prof. Gleitsmann supported the thesis that commercial fusion reactors always were and for the foresseable future will be away 30 years. He was right.

    Oh and the 30 years represent one generation of reserachers, so young ones believe they will reach the goal, elders want at least to witness it.

    Of course we learned a lot about a lot of topics on thew ay to the point we are standing on now.
  3. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    30 May '22 21:26
    @Ponderable
    New work is proceeding both on engineering and fundamental findings. The latest is the result of tests showing plasma turbulence goes about ten times faster than heat traveling through the same plasma, which means new means of detecting turbulence
    leading to loss of heat can now be predicted in enough time to modulate the magnetic fields used to confine the plasma.
  4. Subscribermoonbus
    Über-Nerd
    Joined
    31 May '12
    Moves
    8144
    03 Jun '22 20:241 edit
    @sonhouse

    As I understand it, one of the main technical issues to be resolved is maintaining a stable magnetic containment 'bottle' under extreme heat.
  5. Standard memberSoothfast
    0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,
    Planet Rain
    Joined
    04 Mar '04
    Moves
    2700
    03 Jun '22 21:01
    @moonbus said
    It’s only 30 years away now (again):


    https://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2022/05/world/iter-nuclear-fusion-climate-intl-cnnphotos/
    There's a French Asian fusion restaurant less than 30 years from my house. Does that count?
  6. Subscribermoonbus
    Über-Nerd
    Joined
    31 May '12
    Moves
    8144
    03 Jun '22 21:05
    @soothfast said
    There's a French Asian fusion restaurant less than 30 years from my house. Does that count?
    Only if Jeff Beck is playing jazz fusion there, too.
  7. Standard memberSoothfast
    0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,
    Planet Rain
    Joined
    04 Mar '04
    Moves
    2700
    03 Jun '22 21:10
    @moonbus said
    Only if Jeff Beck is playing jazz fusion there, too.
    Okay. As long as it's clear where the line is drawn.

    I remember the big cold fusion kerfuffle of 1989. I wonder what became of those researchers.
  8. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    03 Jun '22 23:04
    @Soothfast
    I think they are selling hotdogs on the corner of 5th and Vine.
  9. Joined
    18 Jan '07
    Moves
    12363
    04 Jun '22 11:53
    @sonhouse said
    @Soothfast
    I think they are selling hotdogs on the corner of 5th and Vine.
    One of them is long dead.
  10. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    04 Jun '22 13:001 edit
    @Shallow-Blue
    There are still fringe groups trying to prove cold fusion works, strangely enough with no success.

    https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-is-the-current-scien/
  11. Joined
    20 Oct '06
    Moves
    9544
    06 Jun '22 04:23
    @moonbus said
    It’s only 30 years away now (again):


    https://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2022/05/world/iter-nuclear-fusion-climate-intl-cnnphotos/
    the key to science is being wrong. identify the question that is both innovative and solvable with the available tools.
  12. Standard memberbunnyknight
    bunny knight
    planet Earth
    Joined
    12 Dec '13
    Moves
    2917
    06 Jun '22 04:59
    @sonhouse

    So once this fusion becomes perfected and cheap, could it be easily weaponized?

    Will any angry, frustrated teenager be able to vaporize a city with it?
  13. Standard memberSoothfast
    0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,
    Planet Rain
    Joined
    04 Mar '04
    Moves
    2700
    06 Jun '22 06:13
    @bunnyknight said
    @sonhouse

    So once this fusion becomes perfected and cheap, could it be easily weaponized?

    Will any angry, frustrated teenager be able to vaporize a city with it?
    I doubt it. The technology as it's developing would be nowhere near to being portable.

    Actually we already have "fusion bombs," otherwise known as hydrogen bombs or thermonuclear weapons. They work, I think, by using a nuclear fission chain reaction to subject deuterium or tritium (heavy forms of hydrogen) to a temperature and pressure sufficient for nuclear fusion to occur. The whole process probably happens in a fraction of a second, which is all that's needed for a big ka-boom, and we've had the know-how to do this for over half a century.

    Fusion power reactors, in contrast, must maintain temperatures and pressures sufficient for fusion to occur in a continuous fashion, day in and day out. That's a real challenge.
  14. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    06 Jun '22 20:34
    @bunnyknight
    What do you mean? The fusion thing is ALREADY weaponized, that is how you get megaton bombs.
    The only thing we will get from fusion is electricity, not much of a way to weaponize a box that weights 300 tons or more🙂 Aircraft carriers have nuclear fission already, enough juice to run for months without stopping, don't think going to fusion would give them much more energy but if they can the end result will be much less dangerous ways to use in terms of nuclear waste.
  15. Standard memberKilroy70
    within reason
    hicksville
    Joined
    28 Nov '21
    Moves
    4431
    06 Jun '22 22:271 edit
    @sonhouse said
    @bunnyknight
    What do you mean? The fusion thing is ALREADY weaponized, that is how you get megaton bombs.
    The only thing we will get from fusion is electricity, not much of a way to weaponize a box that weights 300 tons or more🙂 Aircraft carriers have nuclear fission already, enough juice to run for months without stopping, don't think going to fusion would give them much ...[text shortened]... gy but if they can the end result will be much less dangerous ways to use in terms of nuclear waste.
    It's good to avoid making nuclear waste, but how would you get electricity from nuclear fusion? Nuclear reactors (fission) heat water that turns to steam that drive turbans that produce electricity. Does it work the same way with fusion? Would the energy created by fusion be used to heat water for driving turbans? If so how would you get the energy produced by fusion to the water?
    Sounds like a daunting (perhaps dangerous?) task to control a fusion reactor.
    Sure, no annoying radioactive waste material to deal with, but I wouldn't want to go anywhere near an operating fusion reactor... at least not until (and without a doubt) it is proven to be safe.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree