Game 5 - Richard McMorran (132) vs Zak Tomlinson (105)
The final round, a game where we both required a win if we wanted to receive a prize.
We were both on 3 points out of 4, with board 1 having the top player on 4/4 vs the sole player on 3.5/4
Six of us had 3/4 and we all played each other.
I started with something solid, but later into the opening I once again (again!) fell flat and found myself behind.
Does my luck prevail in this game?
[Event "Harrogate Congress"] [Site "?"] [Date "2019.01.20"] [Round "5"] [White "McMorran, Richard"] [Black "Tomlinson, Zak"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "D77"] [PlyCount "60"] 1. Nf3 Nf6 2. d4 d5 3. g3 g6 4. Bg2 Bg7 {I often play symmetrically in this opening... though I'm not sure if it's a Queen's Pawn or King's Indian} 5. O-O O-O 6. c4 e6 {Now it's like a Queen's Gambit Declined... on multiple occasions I thought about nabbing the c4 pawn} 7. Nc3 Nc6 8. Bf4 a6 9. Rc1 Re8 {? For a couple of moves now, dxc4 was the top computer suggestion, now White lunges forward} 10. Ne5 Ne7 {? 10... Nxe5 11.dxe5 Ng4 was the best option for Black} 11. cxd5 Nexd5 12. Nxd5 Nxd5 13. Bd2 c6 {To threaten Qb6} 14. e4 Ne7 15. Bc3 Bxe5 {I made the decision to take the game to an almost-endgame, where I would have a 3-to-2 Queenside majority} 16. dxe5 Qxd1 17. Rfxd1 c5 {? But I executed it badly, wanting to play b6 next to prepare Bb7 however I had missed White's next move} 18. Ba5 {Now the c5 pawn is lost, my light-squared Bishop is stuck and my dark-squares are super weak} Nc6 {My thoughts were that if he plays Rxc5 then I get small tempo gains by trapping the Rook after NxB and later b5} 19. Rxc5 {? This was actually played, however Bc7 was a better move, c5 still can't be defended} Nxa5 20. Rxa5 b5 {Now White should play Ra3 immediately and look to quickly regain control} 21. Bf1 {Instead, White repositions the Bishop with a threat to take b5, however Black's next move stops it and in fact was going to be played anyway} Bb7 22. f3 Red8 23. Bd3 {? Rd6 or even Rxd8 avoided encouraging counterplay} Rd4 24. Kf2 Rad8 25. Ke3 Kg7 {I had not seen a way to progress my pieces but had realised Ra3 was not good for White, so after a think I played this} 26. Ra3 {? Although not best (computer suggested pushing Kingside pawns) this move is still playable providing that the sequence goes 26...b4 27.Ra5 Bc6 28.a4 and Black won't be in time to sufficiently gang up on d3} b4 27. Rb3 {?? Instead, this loses material and places Black firmly in the driver's seat} Bc6 28. a3 Ba4 29. Bc2 {? Be2 was better, after which 29... Rxd1 30.Rxb4 Bb5 31.Bxd1 Rxd1 was the top suggested computer line, where White faces an endgame being down a Bishop for 2 pawns} Rxd1 30. Rxb4 {?? This doesn't work as the Bishop is now hanging on c2, confirming that Be2 was better } Bxc2 {White resigned here} 0-1
---------------------------
The fellow on 4/4 won his game, so he finished on 100% and took home the top prize of £500.
The other two games next to me both ended decisively, so there was a three-way tie for 2nd place. We each got £150.
One of the other 2nd placers was my opponent from round 2, Simeon.
Here is the final results crosstable:
http://chess-results.com/tnr408308.aspx?lan=1&art=4&flag=30
The lesson I took from this tournament was that I need to get better in the openings.
Part of this requires learning more theory, but also just maintaining discipline... don't be careless.
--------------
In other news,
The January gradings list was released today, but they have made a mistake.
Apparently, there is a Zak Tomlinson with a grade of 128, which shows all of my graded games...
...apart from the ones in Scarborough which are missing.
Then, separately, there is a Zac Tomlinson with a grade of 157, where the Scarborough games are listed!
I always knew I had a split personality... no I didn't... yes I did.
Anyway, thanks for reading, and as always I hope you got something out of this.
Cheers,
Zak/Zac