17 May '22 03:02>
Non-fungible tokens.
Really?
From wiki:
Proponents of NFTs claim that NFTs provide a public certificate of authenticity or proof of ownership, but the legal rights conveyed by an NFT can be uncertain.
An example:
https://motherofcreation.xyz/
That’s a triptych of Madonna giving birth to various things. Or, a digital representation of Madonna doing these things.
You can view it online, download it, etc.
But, via blockchain, you can own it. And re-sell it, etc.
Why the hell would you want to own something that’s digitally available to all?
Okay, why the hell would you want to own it anyways, but my point is: if everyone can have it for free, why pay to own it?
It seems very much like a scam to me.
Really?
From wiki:
Proponents of NFTs claim that NFTs provide a public certificate of authenticity or proof of ownership, but the legal rights conveyed by an NFT can be uncertain.
An example:
https://motherofcreation.xyz/
That’s a triptych of Madonna giving birth to various things. Or, a digital representation of Madonna doing these things.
You can view it online, download it, etc.
But, via blockchain, you can own it. And re-sell it, etc.
Why the hell would you want to own something that’s digitally available to all?
Okay, why the hell would you want to own it anyways, but my point is: if everyone can have it for free, why pay to own it?
It seems very much like a scam to me.