@eladar said
There was no study of actual people just theoretical results. Face it, there is no real data, just supposition.
The only data I will count as data is large scale study of those who are known to only have immunity naturally and only those have immunity purely by vaccine.
No double counting for vaccine people who already had immunity from natural exposure.
It is literally impossible to run a blinded randomized control trial where one group was all previously infected and the other not. By definition, all subjects will know whether they are in the control group or in the vaccine group.
So, essentially, you will accept no evidence that is
possible to produce?
Or, do you want "in the wild" data, which would be meaningless due to to enormous confounding variables (starting with the fact that all the previously infected survived COVID, skewing that sample to the less vulnerable side). I suppose they could figure out a way to unskew it, but then you'd no doubt accuse them of manipulating the data.
Seems like you are determined not to believe in the vaccine efficacy.
Your choice. Do as you please. I'm happy with my vax, thank you.