@suzianne said
Paid for by Hillary. Authored by Steele, who was in intelligence. The dossier was real. It existed.

The only worth of Republican lies is that they are evidence of prior attempts to buffalo the American people.

Oops, I just got bested by Suzianne. She had said that the dossier was real. I took that to men that the contents thereof were real. The contents of the dossier were all fraud and fake, made up by Christopher steel. But yes, Suzanne, the dossier itself….. I think it was indeed a sort of a brown covered package with several hundred pages in it, a tangible item? It still exists. It will likely be in a museum one day.
So it is real, as you say. Nailed me good. Next time that you pop over for a beer, I will tell you I have a dog. You will look around and say I don’t see a dog. I will say that I have a dog..,, you’ll say ‘show him to me.’. I will get a shovel and dig him up. He died a year ago. So I have the dog, but is he really a dog?
A thumb up for Suzyperson!!!! You got me.

@mchill said
Dear Joe - Quoting a grand total of one (1) carefully handpicked fringe website clarifies absolutely nothing.

If Trump is as squeaky clean as he claims, this trial should be no big deal, so let the legal process work Joe, it's worked reasonably well for nearly 250 years. 😲

This little feller is suggesting that the Forum Not Weigh In on the trial(s) of Trump. We are out of line to discuss it, we are to let the legal process work.
He, or she, is telling me, and thus everyone, to refrain from discussing the trial of Donald Trump, and to let the legal process play out.
That is hard to believe, so maybe he will come back and rephrase what he said and apologize for once again clouding up the forum.

@suzianne said
Let's see... "supporting a rapist"... How much DID you contribute to Trump's "campaign" just this year alone?

My my, here’s the ‘you’ thingy again. I assume you refer to the raping society, the raping mantra, of Hamas? It is part of their culture. We frown a bit on rape in our culture. We frown on people that do it.
Settle. Maybe ponder a bit?

@spruce112358 said
I think they should get the same treatment as Taylor Swift for appearing at the Super Bowl and cheering for the Chiefs. That was totally unfair.

Oh, a subtle dodge. I almost missed it.

@wajoma said
Do you know how you'd look in Trumps place. Your face would appear plastic and inanimate, because it'd be pumped full of embalming fluid. You're like kev bamboozle, of all the things you can have a dig at you choose the wrong things, the amount of pressure that guy's under and the best you've got is his facial expression?

Weak man.

Libs only know personal. Check out all of Suzy's posts, she sent me a three liner this morning and had the word 'YOU' in there 10 times. Nothing on the issue. Pitiful. I wrote her a fatherly note that she is on the wrong track, I am sure she will improve.
Yeah, how bout this guy all over Trump's looks. Lincoln was flat ugly, it is a fact that he grew a beard (...suggested by a child who wrote him a letter..) to try to improve his appearance. This seemingly gay Divegeester
probably spent a bit of time on his hair bun this morning, maybe put on his latest hoodie, to look just right. Trump, likewise, wants to look just right. His life depends on it.
Every lib on this Forum , every one , is a lightweight. Why are we here? Me, I just want to around on November 7th!!!!!!

@quackquack said
I don't really know what is gained by discussions with people who support terrorism, rape and murder (as you put it) but just ignoring their increasing emboldened speech doesn't seem to work either.
Separate from their message (which I agree is condemnable) is their method of transmitting their message. No one has the right to hijack public areas or cause such hostility ...[text shortened]... be against protests that are so violent that schools like Columbia need to avoid in person contact.

Clearly, all posters are for free speech. I am for it even if it leads to a measure of violence....violence is sometimes necessary. I am no shrinking violet. Let them protest, no problem.
But look at these smelly people. Many of them are NOT citizens, maybe greencarders or just interlopers stirring up trouble. If I were Pres, I would round up all noncitizens, who have NO,,,,NO...right to protest, and send them to their country of origin.
Back to the subject, some on this Forum say "I am Hamas'. That means I am rape, I am murder. No other way to cut it. Yes, they have a right to protest, but look what they are. You speak of their message, that is the only message I hear.

@quackquack
I personally have not read these posts because nothing can be derived from them that is not on the news, and it makes me nauseous to converse with people who say 'I am Hamas' which is to support terrorism...rape and murder.
Am i wrong? I dare you to differ.

@suzianne said
Ummm, that's you, cretin.

You think it's the height of comedy. I bet you make 10-year-olds laugh.

Do you do inappropriate jokes at birthday parties?

Sue says 'you' in all of her posts. All of them. Would one of you libs get a'hold of her and clue her in? Totally personal. A brain like Dorothy's scarecrow friend. Offers no true issues.

@divegeester said
If I had a pussy for every time you’d made an ass of yourself on this forum I’d be getting it everyday.

Is that you, Shav?
Have you libs ever noticed how 'the same' that you are? Creepy.

@suzianne said
How embarrassing. You realize you said that out loud, right?

ZZZZZZZZZ. See what I mean?

@suzianne said
Unfortunately not. The fact is, you let him con you again, keeping you in the dark, putting you on notice that he doesn't care what you think, as long as you continue to slavishly vote for him. He thinks that you can't handle the truth.

Too bad that you show us all here every day, that you don't mind being conned. that you actually enjoy it, trying to put a criminal back into the Oval Office. Despite all your talk, you love being a sub to his dom.

Sue, you referred to me TEN times, personally, in this post. Pitiful debating. Imagine debating in your High School debate class, the judges getting weary listening to that. They would forget the issue. And give you an F.
Stick to the Advent of Pronouns, which We dont understand, but it may help you settle.

@suzianne said
No one lied about Russia's involvement in the 2016 election, except the Trump campaign.

There was no "fake dossier". The dossier was quite real.

Again, the only ones who lied about Hunter's laptop were Republicans.

You'd be well-advised to stop telling fibs. They only show you don't mind being taken in by a liar. In fact, you seem proud of it.

Child, the dossier, which was proven to have been bought and paid for by Hillary, was fabricated. You can find it all over google. Authored by crook Christopher Steele.

Any 'lies' about the laptop, if there were any, are quite moot now, would you not agree? Why waste computer ink and our reading comprehension on something like that. I have not even availed myself of Trumphouse posts yet.

@suzianne said
Did Trump use campaign funds for the payoff?

Instead of randomly cleverly writing, do it this way for more followers:
"Trump used campaign funds for the payoff. Worth a trial, for this reason........." And then make your point. Cool. Then a fellow poster has something to answer to.

@shavixmir said
They should be given medals just to piss you off.

Shav, that sue person would tell you to quit spamming the thread.....but you and she are the same. Very confusingly conflicting.

@mott-the-hoople said
what do you think should be done about the 17 officials that lied about Trump on Russia collusion?

Or about Clinton creating the fake Russia dossier?

Or the officials that lied about hunters laptop?

Thumb for Mott